| Popis: |
AGDISP uses canopy structure and collection efficiency to model canopy interception but assumes droplets that intercept a leaf surface are retained at that point and do not bounce or shatter. This behavior is not the case for many plant species, particularly species that are moderately to very difficult to wet, for which canopy deposition would be overestimated with this assumption. This article summarizes the initial implementation of process-based models for spray droplet bounce and shatter within an experimental build of AGDISP in order to predict spray retention within plant canopies. Spray simulations were run for formulations ranging in surface tension, applied to three species (wheat, canola, and capsicum) with different wettabilities and leaf orientations, and using the AGDISP ground model with and without the retention model, to evaluate the impact of the retention model on canopy deposition within AGDISP. The model outputs were also compared to previously determined tracksprayer results. The current AGDISP canopy deposition (interception) model was unable to fully account for differences in retention due to the spray formulation used or species studied. Incorporation of the process-driven models for bounce and shatter allowed these differences to be predicted. Over the three species and four formulations studied, there was good agreement (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.9308, p = 0.0000, indicating an almost certain correlation) between predicted and experimentally determined retention. Considerable work is still required to make this approach practical. However, this article illustrates that the ability to model retention is important for many crops (and weeds) and that the approach outlined herein is an effective adjunct to the current AGDISP interception model. |
