Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT): Turkish validity and reliability study
| Autor: | Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan, Safiye Zeynep Tatli, Hakan Kumbasar, Berker Duman, Zeynep Kotan, Nevzat Mehmet Mutlu, Vahap Ozan Kotan, Damla Sayar Akaslan |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male validity Adolescent Critical Care Turkey Concurrent validity Validity 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Anxiety Article 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine delirium Cronbach's alpha Intensive care Surveys and Questionnaires medicine Humans Psychological testing Translations Reliability (statistics) Aged Aged 80 and over 0303 health sciences Psychological Tests reliability 030306 microbiology business.industry Depression Reproducibility of Results General Medicine Middle Aged Intensive care anxiety depression delirium validity reliability Delirium Female medicine.symptom business Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Volume: 49, Issue: 4 1236-1242 |
| ISSN: | 1303-6165 1300-0144 |
| Popis: | Background/aim: It is of crucial importantance to be able to detect acute psychological distress in patients. The Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT) was developed for this purpose in intensive care units. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IPAT.Materials and methods: In total, 98 patients were included. To assess concurrent validity, the Intensive Care Experiences Scale (ICES) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were performed. Cronbach?s alpha coefficient was used to estimate internal consistency. Interitem and item-total score correlations were also performed. Sensitivity and specificity were derived for concurrent anxiety and depression.Results: The internal reliability was good. Cronbach?s a = 0.85. Items were well-correlated, with an average interitem correlation of 0.38. The concurrent validity of IPAT was good. Correlation between IPAT scores, anxiety, depression, ICES, and the diagnosis of delirium were as follows, respectively: r = 0.61, P < 0.01, r = 0.54, P < 0.01, r = ?0.66, P < 0.01, r = 0.37, P < 0.01. With a cutoff score of ? 6, IPAT showed 85% sensitivity and 61% specificity to detect concurrent anxiety, and 74% sensitivity and 82% specificity to detect concurrent depression [AUC = 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68?0.87) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76?0.92), respectively].Conclusion: The Turkish version of IPAT was found to be a valid and reliable tool to assess acute psychological distress among patients in intensive care units. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|