| Popis: |
Left atrial appendage occlusion using the Watchman device has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is no data on its safety and clinical outcomes in prior renal or liver transplant recipients. We included a total of 61,995 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS, in-hospital outcomes) and 55,048 patients from the National Readmission Database (NRD, 30-day outcomes) who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). From this group, 0.65% (n=405) and 0.62% (n=339) were renal and liver transplant recipients in NIS and NRD respectively. Transplant recipients were younger compared with non-transplant recipients (mean age 69 vs 77 years, P=0.01). There was little difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0% vs 0.2%, P=0.43), major complications (6.2% vs 5.6%, P=0.61), cardiovascular complications (2.5% vs 2.8%, P=0.73), neurological complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.21) or bleeding complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.99) between transplant vs. non-transplant patients. Based on the NRD database, 30-day readmission rate was not meaningfully different for transplant recipients undergoing LAAO (9.44%) when compared to non-transplant patients (8.12%, [log-rank, P=0.56]). There was no difference between 30-day major or cardiovascular complications, however vascular complication rates were significantly higher for transplant recipients (OR 2.56, 95% CI [(1.66-3.47]). Our study findings suggest that LAAO may be safe for patients with a prior renal or liver transplant in terms of major complications, cardiovascular complications, and all-cause readmission rates. However vascular complications may be higher in transplant recipients. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect