Reporting the Presence of Coronary Artery Calcium in the Final Impression of Non-gated CT Chest Scans Increases the Appropriate Utilization of Statins
| Autor: | James K. Aden, Brian Shipley, Satoshi R Shin, Christopher Kaatz, Charles Haller, Sarah Davis, Joshua Boster, Anthony Vandehei, Dustin M. Thomas, Jaclyn Harris, Raymond Fisher, Jessica Rouse, Lisa Townsend |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Statin medicine.drug_class Cardiology 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Ct chest 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine Internal Medicine medicine cardiovascular diseases Aspirin business.industry Medical record statin General Engineering nutritional and metabolic diseases non-gated chest ct Retrospective cohort study Coronary artery calcium Cohort cardiovascular system cac Radiology business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Mace medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Cureus |
| ISSN: | 2168-8184 |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.10579 |
| Popis: | Background Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring based on gated non-contrast cardiac computed tomography (CT) is a validated risk marker of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Reporting of CAC on non-gated CT chest (NGCT) scans and the impact on medical therapy is not well studied. Methods A retrospective cohort of 5,043 NGCT scans was reviewed for the presence of CAC. The radiology report was reviewed to determine whether CAC was mentioned in either the body of the report or the final impression. Electronic medical records (EMR) were abstracted for baseline demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, lipid-lowering agents, and aspirin (ASA) prior to and after NGCT. Results CAC was present in 63.0% of NGCT scans. Of these scans, CAC was mentioned in the body of the report in 81.6% of studies. Conversely, CAC was mentioned in the final impressions in only 15.1% of these scans. Amongst patients with CAC, initiation of a statin in treatment-naive patients was more common when CAC was mentioned in the final impression versus the body only (12.3% vs. 4.9%, p=0.001) despite the fact that baseline utilization of statins in this cohort was higher (71.1% vs. 64.1%, p=0.005). Initiation of a statin in treatment-naive patients had a trend towards significance when CAC was mentioned in the body of the report versus not reported (4.9% vs. 2.62%, p=0.142). Reporting of CAC in the final impression significantly increased the initiation of ASA in treatment-naive patients (9.52% vs. 4.33%, p=0.033). Reporting of CAC in either the final impression or the body of the report did not affect the initiation of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies in patients with CAC. Conclusion The inclusion of CAC in the final impression of NGCT radiology reports positively impacts the appropriate initiation of statin and aspirin therapy in treatment-naive patients. Universal adherence to a standardized reporting system for the presence of CAC on NGCT should be considered to improve the initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|