Reply to Mathot and Naber: Neuroimaging shows that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon
| Autor: | Luisa Prochazkova, H. Steven Scholte, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Eliska Prochazkova, Michael Rojek Giffin, Mariska E. Kret |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Brein en Cognitie (Psychologie, FMG), Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Multidisciplinary
Social phenomenon Interpretation (philosophy) 05 social sciences Pupil Trust 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Neuroimaging Biomimetics Theory of mind Mimicry 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Letters Psychology Citation 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Cognitive psychology |
| Zdroj: | PNAS PNAS, 115(50), E11566-E11567 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(50), E11566-E11567. National Academy of Sciences |
| ISSN: | 0027-8424 |
| Popis: | We recently reported that an individual’s pupils mimic changes in the pupils of his or her interaction partner, that mimicking dilating pupils associates with more trust in economic games, and that such pupil mimicry-related trust tracked neural activation in brain areas associated with theory of mind (1). Our findings confirm earlier studies suggesting that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon (2⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–8). Mathot and Naber (9) question this interpretation, suspecting that differences in luminance in dilating pupils compared with constricting pupils account for the observed effects. They provide some backup for their claim with citation of a study by Derksen et al. (10), in which they examined luminance-controlled stimuli. We find the … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: m.e.kret{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|