Textile testing to assess the resistance to damage of long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria control and prevention
Autor: | Amy Wheldrake, Estelle Guillemois, Vera Chetty, Stephen J. Russell, Hamidreza Arouni |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Long lasting lcsh:Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine Textile Mosquito Control lcsh:RC955-962 Computer science 030231 tropical medicine Physical protection Long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Snagging Snag test parasitic diseases lcsh:RC109-216 Insecticide-Treated Bednets business.industry Research Textiles Structural engineering Abrasion resistance Wounded bursting strength Malaria 030104 developmental biology Infectious Diseases Parasitology Tear test business Malaria control Bursting strength |
Zdroj: | Malaria Journal Malaria Journal, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2021) |
ISSN: | 1475-2875 |
Popis: | BackgroundLLINs are susceptible to forming holes within a short time in use, compromising their ability to provide long-term physical protection against insect-borne vectors of disease. Mechanical damage is known to be responsible for the majority of holes, with most being the result of snagging, tearing, hole enlargement, abrasion and seam failure, which can readily occur during normal household use. To enable an assessment of the ability of LLINs to resist such damage prior to distribution, a new suite of testing methods was developed to reflect the main damage mechanisms encountered during normal use of LLINs.MethodsFour existing BS EN and ISO standards used by the textile industry were adapted to determine the ability of LLINs to resist the most common mechanisms of real-world damage experienced in the field. The new suite comprised tests for snag strength (BS 15,598:2008), bursting strength (ISO 13938-2:1999), hole enlargement resistance (BS 3423–38:1998), abrasion resistance (ISO 12947-1:1998) and new guidance around the seam construction of LLINs. Fourteen different LLINs were tested using the new suite of tests to evaluate their resistance to damage.ResultsThe resistance to mechanical damage of LLINs is not the same, even when the bursting strength values are comparable. Differences in performance between LLINs are directly related to the fabric design specifications, including the knitted structure and constituent yarns. The differences in performance do not primarily relate to what polymer type the LLIN is made from. LLINs made with a Marquisette knitted structure produced the highest snag strength and lowest hole enlargement values. By contrast, LLINs made with a traverse knitted structure exhibited low snag strength values when compared at the same mesh count.ConclusionsPrequalification of LLINs should consider not only insecticidal performance, but also inherent resistance to mechanical damage. This is critical to ensuring LLINs are fit for purpose prior to distribution, and are capable of remaining in good physical condition for longer. The new suite of test methods enables the performance of LLINs to be assessed and specified in advance of distribution and can be used to establish minimum performance standards. Implementation of these testing methods is therefore recommended. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |