Comparison of commercial lateral flow immunoassays and ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection
Autor: | Nuria Tormo Palop, Maria Martínez Serrano, Concepción Gimeno Cardona, David Navalpotro Rodríguez, Mª Dolores Ocete Mochón, Marta Moreno Córdoba, Roberto Olmos Arenas |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
0301 basic medicine diagnosis specificity Antibodies Viral Immunoglobulin G Serology COVID-19 Testing 0302 clinical medicine antibody detection Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Child Aged 80 and over Immunoassay medicine.diagnostic_test biology Middle Aged Infectious Diseases Female Antibody Coronavirus Infections Antibody detection Adult Adolescent Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Pneumonia Viral 030106 microbiology Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Sensitivity and Specificity Article Betacoronavirus Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Virology Humans Serologic Tests Pandemics Aged Clinical Laboratory Techniques business.industry SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Serum samples sensitivity Immunoglobulin A biology.protein business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Virology |
ISSN: | 1873-5967 1386-6532 |
Popis: | Highlights • Serological tests showed poor performances in early serum samples but improved in days 8-15 after onset of symptoms • IgM band in LFI had low sensitivities and might be inadequate for acute diagnosis of COVID-19 infection • Euroimmun commercial IgA ELISA was more sensitive but less specificic than IgG, which showed 100% specificity • Ten days after symptoms’ onset, critical and severe COVID-19 patients had higher ELISA IgG ratios than asymptomatic or mild ones Background COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide since December 2019. Serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing are needed for detection of current or past infections. A wide range of commercial tests is available. However, most of them need to be validated. Study design The aim was to compare a commercial IgG and IgA ELISA (Euroimmun) with three lateral flow immunoassays (LFI): Hangzhou Alltest Biotech, Wuhan UNscience Biotechnology and Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech. Specificity was calculated with 62 available serum samples from 2018/19. The study included 152 sera from patients of which 109 were RT-PCR positive. Sensitivities for ELISA anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA were 81,5% and 93,1% and specificities 100% and 80,6%, respectively. LFI showed variable performances, overall results being better for Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech. Conclusions Commercial serological tests are useful for detection of antibodies in patients with COVID-19. ELISA presented better results than LFI. The results allowed to incorporate the most sensitive LFI to the daily workflow, combining with ELISA. Careful validation is encouraged before clinical laboratories start using these tests. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |