Evidence that Two-Year-Old Children are Sensitive to Information Presented in Arguments

Autor: Hugo Mercier, Stéphane Bernard, Thomas Castelain
Přispěvatelé: Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR), Université de Neuchâtel (UNINE), Institut Jean-Nicod (IJN), Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département de Philosophie - ENS Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Infancy
Infancy, Wiley, 2018, 23 (1), pp.124-135. ⟨10.1111/infa.12202⟩
Infancy, vol 23.(1), pp 124–135.
Kérwá
Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron:UCR
ISSN: 1525-0008
1532-7086
DOI: 10.1111/infa.12202⟩
Popis: International audience; Preschoolers are more likely to endorse testimony supported by strong arguments than by weak, circular ones. Two‐year‐olds exchange arguments with others, but no experiment has demonstrated that they are sensitive to information presented as argument. In the first phase of this study, 2‐year‐olds were shown ambiguous pictures—for instance a bird–fish hybrid—and asked what they thought the picture represented. An informant then contradicted them, providing either a strong argument, a circular argument, or no argument, and the children were asked what they now thought the hybrid was. The second phase was identical to the first, with new hybrids, except that the informant never provided any argument for her position. Finally, in the third phase, the informant left the room and the children were asked again to tell what the hybrids from the first two phases were. On the whole, there was an effect of the amount of information provided in the argument so that children were more likely to endorse labels provided by the informant who had supported her answer with a strong argument in the first phase. Moreover, they generalized the trust granted to informants who provided strong arguments. These results constitute the first experimental demonstration that 2‐year‐olds possess some argument evaluation skills.
Databáze: OpenAIRE