Turkish inappropriate medication use in the elderly (TIME) criteria to improve prescribing in older adults: TIME-to-STOP/TIME-to-START

Autor: Kutay Demirkan, Belgin Izgi, Ali Mert, Ates Kadioglu, Sibel Cakir, Mustafa Erelel, Onay Yalcin, Isin Baral Kulaksizoglu, Ahmet Kaya Bilge, Meryem Merve Oren, Savas Ozturk, Ilhan Satman, Hasmet Hanagasi, Gulistan Bahat, Mehmet Sukru Sever, Yağız Üresin, Nilufer Yesilot, Kerim Güler, Meltem Halil, Filiz Akyuz, Zekeriya Ulger, Ayşe Karan, Birkan Ilhan, Tugba Erdogan, Mehmet Akif Karan, Sumru Savas, Tufan Tükek
Přispěvatelé: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, KKÜ, Ege Üniversitesi
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Geriatric Medicine
ISSN: 1878-7657
DOI: 10.1007/s41999-020-00297-z
Popis: Key summary points Aim To meet the current need in different European countries for improving prescribing in older adults, we aimed to create an update screening tool getting origin from the two user friendly criterion sets: the STOPP/STARTv2 criteria and CRIME criteria. Findings Based on thorough literature review, 55 criteria were added, 17 criteria were removed, and 60 criteria were modified. As a result, 153 TIME criteria composed of 112 TIME-to-STOP and 41 TIME-to-START criteria were introduced. Message TIME criterion set is an update screening tool reported from Eastern Europe that included experts from geriatrics and other specialties frequently giving care to older adults and some additional practical explanations for clinical use. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00297-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Purpose To improve prescribing in older adults, criterion sets have been introduced from different countries. While current criterion sets are useful to some extent, they do not meet the need in some European countries. Turkish inappropriate medication use in the elderly (TIME) criteria was planned to meet this need. Methods In phase 1, the user friendly sets: STOPP/START version2 and CRIME criteria were combined. National experts composed of geriatricians and non-geriatricians were invited to review and comment. In phase 2, thorough literature review was performed and reference-based revisions, omissions, and additions were made. Explanatory additions were added to some criteria to improve application in practice. In phase 3, all working group members reviewed the criteria/explanations and agreed on the final content. Results Phase 1 was performed by 49 expert academicians between May and October 2016. Phase 2 was performed by 23 working group academicians between October 2016 and November 2018 and included face-to-face interviews between at least two geriatrician members and one criterion-related specialist. Phase 3 was completed between November 2018–March 2019 with review and approval of all criteria by working group academicians. As a result, 55 criteria were added, 17 criteria were removed, and 60 criteria were modified from the first draft. A total of 153 TIME criteria composed of 112 TIME-to-STOP and 41 TIME-to-START criteria were introduced. Conclusion TIME criteria is an update screening tool that differs from the current useful tools by the interactive study of experts from geriatrics and non-geriatrics, inclusion of practical explanations for some criteria and by its eastern European origin. TIME study respectfully acknowledges its roots from STOPP/START and CRIME criteria. Studies are needed whether it would lead improvements in older adults’ health. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00297-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: