Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting
Autor: | Martin de Santibañes, Eduardo de Santibañes, Guillermo Arbues, Pedro Uad, Juan Pekolj, Martín Palavecino, Rodrigo Sanchez-Claria, Matias E. Czerwonko, Oscar Mazza |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Argentina Postoperative recovery 03 medical and health sciences Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Retrospective Studies Cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic Retrograde Common Bile Duct Common bile duct exploration business.industry Incidence Significant difference Gastroenterology Retrospective cohort study Perioperative Gallstones Length of Stay Middle Aged medicine.disease Surgery Choledocholithiasis Treatment Outcome Cholecystectomy Laparoscopic Elective Surgical Procedures 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Operative time Female 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Emergencies business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 23:1848-1855 |
ISSN: | 1873-4626 1091-255X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11605-018-4029-x |
Popis: | Emergent laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has been reported to be on the increase in some institutions, reflecting the growing confidence with the technique. However, no study has focused on the outcomes of LTCBDE in the non-elective setting. The aim of this study is to investigate whether LTCBDE can be performed effectively and safely in the emergency. This is a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis subjected for LTCBDE at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires from January 2009 to January 2018. Procedures were classified according to the setting as emergent or elective. Demographic data and perioperative parameters were compared between groups. Throughout the period comprised, 500 patients were admitted for choledocholithiasis and gallstones. A single-step treatment combining LTCBDE and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted: 211 (42.2%) were performed electively and the 289 (57.8%) as an emergency. There was no significant difference in the success rate of LTCBDE (93.9% versus 93.8%, p = 0.975) for the two groups. The operative time was slightly longer in the emergency group (122 ± 63 versus 106 ± 53 min, p = 0.002). Postoperative recovery was slower in the emergency group, as reflected by a higher rate of prolonged postoperative stay (21.1% vs 5.7%, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |