[Do Turkish reimbursement recommendations cover current European Lipid Guidelines? A retrospective analysis of patients presenting with first acute coronary syndrom]
Autor: | Murat Esin, Duygu Ersan Demirci, Özkan Kayhan, Şakir Arslan, Deniz Demirci |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male lcsh:Internal medicine lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system medicine.medical_specialty Acute coronary syndrome statin treatment Turkey european society of cardiology guidelines health implementation directive lcsh:Medicine Hyperlipidemias Diabetes Complications Internal medicine Diabetes mellitus Hyperlipidemia medicine hyperlipidemia Humans Acute Coronary Syndrome lcsh:RC31-1245 Reimbursement Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over business.industry lcsh:R Age Factors Retrospective cohort study Cholesterol LDL Statin treatment Middle Aged medicine.disease Primary Prevention Stenosis lcsh:RC666-701 embryonic structures Insurance Health Reimbursement Practice Guidelines as Topic Physical therapy Female Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Risk assessment business |
Zdroj: | Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Vol 45, Iss 7, Pp 623-629 (2017) |
ISSN: | 1308-4488 |
Popis: | Objective: This study was a comparison of the statin therapy protocol issued by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Ministry of Health's Health Implementation Directive (SUT) in Turkey, performed in order to assess the adequacy of hyperlipidemia treatment indications for primary prevention. Methods: A total of 582 patients with first acute coronary syndrome were included in the study. Patients with noncritical stenosis observed on coronary angiography or a history of atherosclerotic disease were excluded. The risk calculation was determined using age, sex, smoking status, presence of diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and lipoprotein levels. Statin treatment indications were evaluated according to the ESC guidelines (2016) and the SUT (2016). Results: Statin treatment was indicated for 96% of diabetic patients, and according to the ESC, it was appropriate for 13.5% of nondiabetic patients, while the SUT recommendation included 13.3% of nondiabetic patients (p190 mg/dL there was greater discrepancy between the SUT and ESC guidelines. According to the SUT, all patients >190 mg/dL are to receive treatment. The ESC had more guidelines than the SUT for cases of LDL-C 60 years of age and those with LDL-C >160 mg/dL should be reassessed, as they are more limited than those of the ESC. A new treatment algorithm should be defined. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |