Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored by Various Direct Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study
Autor: | Silvia Timkova, Jozef Mincik, Renata Urban, Daniel Urban |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Materials science
Article Subject lcsh:Biotechnology 0206 medical engineering Composite number Biomedical Engineering Dentistry 02 engineering and technology engineering.material Biomaterials 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine stomatognathic system Group (periodic table) lcsh:TP248.13-248.65 In vitro study business.industry Significant difference 030206 dentistry 020601 biomedical engineering Amalgam (dentistry) Filling materials engineering Fracture (geology) Cusp (anatomy) business Research Article |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Biomaterials International Journal of Biomaterials, Vol 2016 (2016) |
ISSN: | 1687-8795 1687-8787 |
Popis: | The aim of this study is to compare the effect of various restorative materials on fracture resistance in maxillary premolars. Premolars (n=64) with no restorations or cracks were selected. MOD cavities were prepared considering the buccolingual width to be equal to half of the intercuspal distance. The specimens were randomly divided into 8 groups, 8 specimens each:group Aintact teeth,group Bunfilled cavity,group Ccomposite made by oblique layering technique,group Dcomposite with 2 mm cusp coverage,group Ebulk-filled posterior composite,group Fglass-ionomer,group Gamalgam, andgroup Hcomposite with proximal boxes. The specimens were subjected to an axial compression load with the mean values of fracture resistance in group A: 1289 N, group B: 181.75 N, group C: 445.38 N, group D: 645.88 N, group E: 355.13 N, group F: 352.00 N, group G: 191.38 N, and group H: 572.00 N. There was no significant difference between groups B and G, between C and D, E, and F, and between group D and H. All other measurements were statistically significant. We conclude that composite restoration with cusp coverage is the most ideal nonprosthetic solution for endodontically treated teeth. Cusp coverage increases the fracture resistance compared to the conventional cavity design. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |