Simulated damage of two implant debridement methods: Nonsurgical approach with Teflon and stainless steel hand scalers
| Autor: | Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Marco Antonio Bottino, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Dimas Renno de Lima, João Paulo Mendes Tribst |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Oral Regenerative Medicine (ORM), Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Peri-implantitis Modeling software medicine.medical_treatment 030106 microbiology Cleaning instruments Prosthesis 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Residual stress medicine Analysis software Statistical analysis business.industry 030206 dentistry implant surfaces hand instruments lcsh:RK1-715 medicine.anatomical_structure lcsh:Dentistry dental/oral implants Periodontics Cortical bone Original Article Implant business Biomedical engineering peri-implantitis |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 22(4), 340-344. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, Vol 22, Iss 4, Pp 340-344 (2018) Scopus Repositório Institucional da UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology Tribst, J P, Dal Piva, A, De Lima, D, Borges, A & Bottino, M 2018, ' Simulated damage of two implant debridement methods : Nonsurgical approach with Teflon and stainless steel hand scalers ', Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 340-344 . https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_201_18 |
| ISSN: | 0972-124X |
| DOI: | 10.4103/jisp.jisp_201_18 |
| Popis: | Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:21:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018-07-01 Background: Mechanical scaling is the most common treatment of periodontal and peri-implant tissue infections. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of mechanical prophylactic therapy on the residual stresses in the implant and hand scaler. Settings and Design: For finite-element analysis, an implant-supported prosthesis was created using modeling software with 3 mm of exposed threads. For simulation of a prophylactic mechanical debridement, the active face of the shank was disposed of in contact with the last thread exposed at a 90° angle. Materials and Methods: In the analysis software, the contacts were defined as rough between the instrument and the implant. The cortical bone was fixed and a load of 10 N was applied to the instrument cable. Two simulations were performed according to the instrument material: Stainless steel or Teflon. Von-Mises results were obtained. Statistical Analysis Used: No statistical test was used, but, the 500 higher stress peaks in the implant and in the instrument were analyzed for qualitative comparison. Results: Mechanical prophylactic therapy generates higher residual stress on the implant with a stainless steel instrument. There was no difference between the materials for the active tip of the instrument, and the active portion of the shank was the region which concentrated more stress. Conclusions: It is suggested that hand scalers in Teflon are less damaging to the implant, but more susceptible to deformation and possible early failures. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology Saõ José Dos Campos, 777 Avenida Eng Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology Saõ José Dos Campos, 777 Avenida Eng |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|