Evaluating meaningful levels of financial toxicity in gynecologic cancers

Autor: Lindsay Rucker, Katharine M. Esselen, Sarah S. Summerlin, Warner K. Huh, Meghan Shea, Sara Bouberhan, Maria Pisu, Margaret I. Liang, Michele R. Hacker, Annika Gompers
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 31:801-806
ISSN: 1525-1438
1048-891X
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002475
Popis: ObjectiveThe Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) is a validated instrument measuring the economic burden experienced by patients with cancer. We evaluated the frequency of financial toxicity at different COST levels and stratified risk factors and associations with cost-coping strategies by financial toxicity severity.MethodsWe analyzed previously collected survey data of gynecologic oncology patients from two tertiary care institutions. Both surveys included the COST tool and questions assessing economic and behavioral cost-coping strategies. We adapted a proposed grading scale to define three groups: no/mild, moderate, and severe financial toxicity and used χ2, Fisher’s exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare groups. We used Poisson regression to calculate crude and adjusted risk ratios for cost-coping strategies, comparing patients with moderate or severe to no/mild financial toxicity.ResultsAmong 308 patients, 14.9% had severe, 32.1% had moderate, and 52.9% had no/mild financial toxicity. Younger age, non-white race, lower education, unemployment, lower income, use of systemic therapy, and shorter time since diagnosis were associated with worse financial toxicity (all pConclusionsAmong a geographically diverse cohort of gynecologic oncology patients, nearly half reported financial toxicity (COST
Databáze: OpenAIRE