Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Autor: | Robert A. Gerber, Kimberly J. Dandreo, David Gruben, George W. Reed, Liza Takiya, Ying Shan, Joel M. Kremer, Gene V. Wallenstein |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Tofacitinib lcsh:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Combination therapy business.industry medicine.disease Rheumatology Anti-TNF Rheumatoid arthritis Concomitant Internal medicine Immunology and Allergy Medicine Tumor necrosis factor alpha Methotrexate lcsh:RC925-935 business DMARDs (synthetic) Original Research medicine.drug Cohort study |
Zdroj: | Rheumatology and Therapy, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 573-586 (2019) Rheumatology and Therapy |
ISSN: | 2198-6584 2198-6576 |
Popis: | Introduction No published studies exist comparing the effectiveness of tofacitinib with other advanced therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice. Here, we report differences in effectiveness of tofacitinib compared with standard of care, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX), using US Corrona registry data. Methods This observational cohort study included RA patients receiving tofacitinib (from 6 November 2012; N = 558) or TNFi (from 1 November 2001; N = 8014) with or without MTX until 31 July 2016. Efficacy outcomes at 6 months included modified American College of Rheumatology 20% responses, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Pain. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving TNFi and tofacitinib with or without MTX and by line of therapy. Outcomes within therapy lines were compared using propensity-score matching; between-group differences were estimated using mixed-effects regression models. Results Patients receiving tofacitinib had longer RA duration and a greater proportion had previously received biologics than those receiving TNFi; other baseline characteristics were comparable. In patients receiving second- and third-line TNFi therapy, CDAI low disease activity/remission response rates were significantly better with concomitant MTX. Too few patients received tofacitinib as second line for meaningful assessment. No significant differences were observed in outcomes between tofacitinib as monotherapy and tofacitinib with concomitant MTX. Conclusions In clinical practice, TNFi efficacy is improved with concomitant MTX in the second and third line. In the third/fourth line, patients are likely to achieve similar efficacy with tofacitinib monotherapy, or TNFi or tofacitinib in combination with MTX. Funding Pfizer Inc Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-00177-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |