A Multi-Atlas Based Method for Automated Anatomical Rat Brain MRI Segmentation and Extraction of PET Activity
Autor: | Elise Levigoureux, Caroline Bouillot, Sophie Lancelot, Afifa Slimen, Luc Zimmer, Roxane Roche, Nicolas Costes, Jean-Baptiste Langlois |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Radiopharmaceutical and Neurochemical Biomarkers Team (BioRaN), Centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Multimodal Et Pluridisciplinaire en imagerie du vivant (CERMEP - imagerie du vivant), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-CHU Grenoble-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-CHU Saint-Etienne-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA) |
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging
Computer science Nervous System Brain mapping 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Rats Sprague-Dawley 0302 clinical medicine Image Processing Computer-Assisted Brain segmentation Mammals Brain Mapping Multidisciplinary medicine.diagnostic_test Atlas (topology) Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging In Vivo Imaging medicine.anatomical_structure Positron emission tomography Vertebrates Medicine [SDV.NEU]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC] Anatomy Preclinical imaging Research Article Imaging Techniques Science education Neuroimaging Image processing Image Analysis Research and Analysis Methods Rodents Sensitivity and Specificity 03 medical and health sciences Atlases as Topic Atlas (anatomy) Image Interpretation Computer-Assisted medicine Animals Biology and life sciences business.industry Neurotransmission Organisms Sprague-Dawley rats Magnetic resonance imaging Pattern recognition Rats Neuroanatomy Positron-Emission Tomography Animal Studies Artificial intelligence Nuclear medicine business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Neuroscience |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2014, 9 (10), pp.0109113. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0109113⟩ PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 10, p e109113 (2014) |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0109113 |
Popis: | IntroductionPreclinical in vivo imaging requires precise and reproducible delineation of brain structures. Manual segmentation is time consuming and operator dependent. Automated segmentation as usually performed via single atlas registration fails to account for anatomo-physiological variability. We present, evaluate, and make available a multi-atlas approach for automatically segmenting rat brain MRI and extracting PET activies.MethodsHigh-resolution 7T 2DT2 MR images of 12 Sprague-Dawley rat brains were manually segmented into 27-VOI label volumes using detailed protocols. Automated methods were developed with 7/12 atlas datasets, i.e. the MRIs and their associated label volumes. MRIs were registered to a common space, where an MRI template and a maximum probability atlas were created. Three automated methods were tested: 1/registering individual MRIs to the template, and using a single atlas (SA), 2/using the maximum probability atlas (MP), and 3/registering the MRIs from the multi-atlas dataset to an individual MRI, propagating the label volumes and fusing them in individual MRI space (propagation & fusion, PF). Evaluation was performed on the five remaining rats which additionally underwent [18F]FDG PET. Automated and manual segmentations were compared for morphometric performance (assessed by comparing volume bias and Dice overlap index) and functional performance (evaluated by comparing extracted PET measures).ResultsOnly the SA method showed volume bias. Dice indices were significantly different between methods (PF>MP>SA). PET regional measures were more accurate with multi-atlas methods than with SA method.ConclusionsMulti-atlas methods outperform SA for automated anatomical brain segmentation and PET measure's extraction. They perform comparably to manual segmentation for FDG-PET quantification. Multi-atlas methods are suitable for rapid reproducible VOI analyses. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |