Clinical comparison of the efficacy of three different bowel preparation methods on the infectious complications following transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsy in nursing practice

Autor: Yu Zhang, Jing Yang, Yong Jia, Yu‐rong Ma, Wei‐hua Guo, Xin‐hong Zhang, Si-Chuan Hou, Chang-Cun Zhang
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 27:2583-2589
ISSN: 1365-2702
0962-1067
Popis: Aims and objectives To assess the effects of three different bowel preparation methods on the incidence of infectious complications in patients who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. Background The standard bowel preparation protocol for prostate biopsy has not been established. Design A retrospective study in a single centre. Methods From January 2013–December 2015, the clinical records of 1,130 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were, respectively, reviewed. All the patients received metronidazole prophylaxis before biopsy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the bowel preparation methods: patients in Group A (n = 402) received only soapy enema; patients in Group B (n = 413) received polyethylene glycol; while patients in Group C (n = 315) received polyethylene glycol plus povidone–iodine enema. Infectious complications were classified as fever (>37.5°C), urinary tract infection and sepsis. The postoperative adverse events were also observed. Results The overall postbiopsy infectious complications were observed in 48 (4.25%) patients of all the cases, including 23 (5.72%) cases in Group A, 20 (4.84%) cases in Group B and five patients (1.59%) in Group C. There was significant difference among the groups (p = .018). In detail, these infectious complications included 22 (1.95%) cases of fever and 26 (2.30%) cases of urinary tract infection. No sepsis was observed among the total patients. The incidence of adverse events was 14.43% (58/402) occurred in Group A, 25.91% (107/413) in Group B and 26.67% (84/315) in Group C. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Our study confirmed that combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone–iodine enema could significantly reduce the postbiopsy infection rate. Conventional soapy enema is associated with less adverse events. Relevance to clinical practice Findings of this study provide useful evidence-based information for healthcare professionals. The application of combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone–iodine enema resulted in better improvement in the prevention of postbiopsy infection.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: