Un cadre conceptuel pour les systèmes de formation, conseil et information en forêt privée : comprendre la diversité et les changements un Europe
| Autor: | Diana Feliciano, Lelde Vilkriste, Liviu Nichiforel, Ari Talkkari, Didier Marchal, Anna Lawrence, Erik Wilhelmsson, Meelis Teder, Teppo Hujala, Torgny Lind, Philippe Deuffic, Krzysztof Jodłowski |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Environnement, territoires et infrastructures (UR ETBX), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), University of Eastern Finland, NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE FINLAND HELSINKI FIN, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), UNIVERSITY STEFAN CEL MARE SUCEAVA ROM, UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN GBR, FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE POL, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), WILDLIFE AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT BEL, KARELIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES FIN, ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES TARTU EST, LATVIA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES LVA |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
Geography Planning and Development Forest management 0211 other engineering and technologies 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences Management Monitoring Policy and Law PROPRIÉTAIRE FORESTIER 01 natural sciences Ecosystem services Goods and services Information system Recreation 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Nature and Landscape Conservation media_common Government 021107 urban & regional planning Forestry 15. Life on land Private sector FORMATION Interdependence [SDE]Environmental Sciences Business |
| Zdroj: | Land Use Policy Land Use Policy, Elsevier, 2020, 94, pp.104522-. ⟨10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104522⟩ |
| ISSN: | 0264-8377 |
| Popis: | International audience; The decisions and actions of private forest owners are important for the delivery of forest goods and services. Both forest ownership, and policies related to forest owners, are changing. Traditionally in most countries, government extension officers have advised and instructed forest owners, but this is evolving, with greater importance given to a range of actors, objectives, and knowledge types. Drawing on literature and mixed data from 10 countries in Europe, this paper explores how forestry advisory systems can be conceptualized, and describes their current situation in Europe. Drawing parallels with the concept of AKIS (Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems), we propose the term FOKIS (FOrestry Knowledge and Information Systems), as both a system (a purposeful and interdependent group of bodies) and a method for understanding such systems. We define four dimensions for describing FOKIS: owners, policy goals, advice providers, and tools. We find different roles for extension in countries with centrally controlled, highly regulated forest management, and advisors in regions where forest owners have more freedom to choose how to manage their forest. We find five trends across Europe: increasing flexibility, openness and participation of owners as sources of information; increasing reliance on information and persuasion rather than enforced compliance; a shift of attention from timber to a wider range of ecosystem services such as biodiversity and recreation; a shift of funding and providers from public to private sector; emergence of new virtual communication tools. The approach provides a way to make sense of comparisons and change in FOKIS, and opens up an important research field. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect