Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R Research Validity Scales for Discriminating Analog Malingering and Genuine Psychopathology
| Autor: | Ruth A. Baer, Jason C.B. Rinaldo, Alison Caldwell-Andrews, Jessica Smerz, David T. R. Berry, R. Michael Bagby |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2001 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Malingering Adolescent Personality Inventory Psychometrics Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis media_common.quotation_subject Test validity Developmental psychology Diagnosis Differential Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Outpatients medicine Humans Personality Raw score Personality test Aged media_common Psychopathology integumentary system Mental Disorders Reproducibility of Results Middle Aged medicine.disease Clinical Psychology Case-Control Studies Female Psychology Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Personality Assessment. 76:496-516 |
| ISSN: | 1532-7752 0022-3891 |
| DOI: | 10.1207/s15327752jpa7603_10 |
| Popis: | We investigated the research validity scales for the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R) proposed by Schinka, Kinder, and Kremer (1997): Positive Presentation Management (PPM) and Negative Presentation Management (NPM). Additionally, an experimental analog to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2's (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) F - K index was calculated by subtracting the raw score on PPM from the raw score on NPM (NPM - PPM). In 2 studies, all indexes showed significant between-group differences when samples of analog malingerers (n = 97) were contrasted with psychiatric outpatients (n = 272). The sensitivity and specificity of these validity indexes indicated that although none performed well in extremely low base rate environments, the NPM and NPM - PPM indexes showed promise when the base rate of faking bad rose to higher levels. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |