Transobturator versus single incision slings: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial
| Autor: | G. Willy Davila, Vivian C. Aguilar, Aimee L. Tieu, Peter A. Castillo, Aparna Hegde |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Stress incontinence Time Factors Urinary Incontinence Stress Urology Operative Time 030232 urology & nephrology Urinary incontinence law.invention Sling (weapon) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Blood loss law medicine Humans Patient Reported Outcome Measures Single institution Suburethral Slings Chi-Square Distribution 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Obstetrics and Gynecology Middle Aged medicine.disease Prosthesis Failure Surgery Treatment Outcome Single incision Operative time Female medicine.symptom business Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | International Urogynecology Journal. 28:461-467 |
| ISSN: | 1433-3023 0937-3462 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-016-3128-z |
| Popis: | To compare 1-year surgical outcomes following transobturator (TO) sling placement and single incision (SI) sling placement for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We performed a randomized trial at a single institution. Patients with urodynamically proven SUI were offered participation and randomized to placement of a TO sling (Monarc™) or a SI sling (MiniArc™) between 2008 and 2011. The primary outcome measure was urinary leakage during standardized cough stress test (CST). Forty subjects in each group were required to achieve 80 % power to detect an effect size of 0.25. A total of 98 patients were randomized with 49 patients in the TO group and 49 patients in the SI group. Preoperative demographics were similar between the groups (Table 1). The TO group had a significantly longer sling operative time (10.7 ± 4.8 min vs. 7.8 ± 4.9 min, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink