Different criteria for determining DRIS standards influencing the nutritional diagnosis and potential fertilization response of sugarcane

Autor: Fernando José Freire, Gilson Moura Filho, Águila Silva Santos, Leila Cruz da Silva Calheiros, Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira, José Valdemir Tenório da Costa, Flávio José Rodrigues Cruz, Adriano Barbosa Moura
Přispěvatelé: Federal University of Alagoas, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Triunfo Farmer, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scopus
Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
ISSN: 1835-2707
1835-2693
DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.06.pne1147
Popis: Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-28T19:09:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018-06-01 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Integrated System of Diagnostic and Recommendation (DRIS) require establishment of norms for calculation of dual relationships between nutrients. Depending on the criteria used to establish the norms, nutritional diagnosis may vary. The objective of this study was to establish DRIS standards for sugarcane by different criteria and to evaluate the influence of these standards on the nutritional diagnoses. Four criteria were used: Nutrient relations with higher variance ratio between population of low and high productivity (C1); Nutrient relations with higher variance ratio and lower coefficient of asymmetry with partial transformation of Box and Cox (C2) and with total transformation of Box and Cox (C3); Nutrient relations with logarithmic neperian transformation (C4). The database consisted of 183 samples, in which 31 were in areas with high productivity (≥ 80 Mg ha-1) and 152 in areas with low productivity ( < 80 Mg ha-1). Sugarcane leaves in posicion (+3) were collected and contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn and B were determined, according to the Kuijper system. The results implied that criteria for choosing nutritional relations with high ratios of variance for establishment of the DRIS norms were not adequate because the data were not standardized and presented a high probability of diagnosing nutritional imbalance. Criteria of the nutritional relations with high ratios of variance with a lowest asymmetry coefficient were more adequate because the data were normalized, providing similar nutritional diagnoses. Nutritional diagnoses were influenced by the criteria used to generate DRIS standards, diagnosing differences in positive response to fertilization. Center for Agrarian Sciences Federal University of Alagoas, BR-104 Agronomy Department Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Street Dom Manoel de Medeiros Coruripe Company Triunfo Farmer, Rural Zone Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Department of Vegetable Production and Horticulture São Paulo State University, Stret Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Department of Vegetable Production and Horticulture São Paulo State University, Stret Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane
Databáze: OpenAIRE