| Autor: |
Federico Andreoletti, Filippo Maselli, Lorenzo Storari, Andrea Vongher, Monica Erbesato, Marco Testa, Andrea Turolla |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Federico Andreoletti, Filippo Maselli, Lorenzo Storari, Andrea Vongher, Monica Erbesato, Marco Testa, Andrea Turolla |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19:16418 |
| ISSN: |
1660-4601 |
| Popis: |
Objective: To investigate the most common physical examination tests (PET) for the screening for referral of patients with back or chest pain caused by serious pathology. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed on seven electronic databases between June 2020 and December 2021. Only studies evaluating patients with back and/or chest pain with clear reporting of PETs and prompt patient referrals were included. Results: 316 full texts were included, and these studies had a total of 474/492 patients affected by a serious disease. Only 26 studies of them described suspicion of serious disease due to at least one positive PET. Cardiac/pulmonary auscultation and heartbeats/blood pressure measurements were the most frequently reported tests. None of the reported studies included physiotherapists and chiropractors who reported the use of various tests, such as: cardiac and pulmonary auscultation, lung percussion, costovertebral angle tenderness, and lymph node palpation, highlighting a lack of attention in measuring vital parameters. On the contrary, doctors and nurses reported the assessment of the range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine and hip less frequently. Conclusions: Appropriate reporting of PETs is sparse, and their utilization is heterogeneous among different healthcare professionals. Further primary studies are needed to describe PETs results in patients suffering from back and/or chest pain. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
