Philosophy of Cognitive Science
| Autor: | Daniel Andler |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Brenner, Anastasios Gayon, Jean |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Cognitive science
Philosophy of sport Philosophy 05 social sciences Subject (philosophy) sciences cognitives 06 humanities and the arts Philosophy of psychology 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Philosophy education 16. Peace & justice 050105 experimental psychology Epistemology [SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences Philosophy of computer science Philosophy of biology 060302 philosophy philosophie 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Western philosophy Philosophical methodology |
| Zdroj: | French Studies In The Philosophy Of Science ISBN: 9781402093678 French Studies in the Philosophy of Science Brenner, Anastasios Gayon, Jean. French Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Springer, pp.255-301, 2009, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science |
| DOI: | 10.1093/oso/9780190690649.003.0016 |
| Popis: | The rise of cognitive science in the last half-century has been accompanied by a considerable amount of philosophical activity. No other area within analytic philosophy in the second half of that period has attracted more attention or produced more publications. Philosophical work relevant to cognitive science has become a sprawling field (extending beyond analytic philosophy) which no one can fully master, although some try and keep abreast of the philosophical literature and of the essential scientific developments. Due to the particular nature of its subject, it touches on a multitude of distinct special branches in philosophy and in science. It has also become quite a difficult, complicated and technical field, to the point of being nearly impenetrable for philosophers or scientists coming from other fields or traditions. Finally, it is contentious: Cognitive science is far from having reached stability, it is still widely regarded with suspicion, philosophers working within its confine have sharp disagreements amongst themselves, and philosophers standing outside, especially (but not only) of non-analytic persuasion, are often inclined to see both cognitive science and its accompanying philosophy as more or less confused or even deeply flawed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|