Revisiting Shenhar and Dvir’s Diamond Model: Do We Need an Upgrade?
Autor: | Anne-Sofie Hansen, Per Svejvig, Lars K. Hansen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Ding, Ronggui, Wagner, Reinhard, Bodea, Constanta-Nicoleta |
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering ISBN: 9783030862473 Hansen, A-S, Svejvig, P & Hansen, L K 2022, Revisiting Shenhar and Dvir’s Diamond Model: Do We Need an Upgrade? in R Ding, R Wagner & C-N Bodea (eds), Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management : Projects as an Arena for Self-Organizing . Springer, Cham, pp. 175-190, IPMA Research Conference, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 09/09/2020 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86248-0_11 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-86248-0_11 |
Popis: | In 2017, Shenhar and Dvir released their Diamond Model as a typology for project categorization with the following dimensions: novelty, technology, complexity, and pace. The Diamond Model is useful for uncovering the project type at hand with a view to selecting a suitable management style. The objective of the model is to be universal and context-free to capture a broad spectrum of projects. However, the model was built on military and commercial market product projects primarily in the United States and Israel, calling into question the validity of the model in other settings. This study addresses this problem and seeks to evaluate the Diamond Model in different settings. The study uses a mixed-methods approach and evaluates data from 62 projects in 16 project-based organizations. The study points to several ways to upgrade the model, such as splitting the pace dimension into two dimensions: pace (time) and impact. The study contributes to a broader discussion of the categorization of projects |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |