Urban versus forest ecotypes are not explained by divergent reproductive selection

Autor: Arnaud Grégoire, Aude E. Caizergues, Anne Charmantier
Přispěvatelé: Université de Montpellier (UM), Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
0106 biological sciences
0301 basic medicine
Avian clutch size
Male
Time Factors
Adaptation
Biological

urbanization
adaptation
Breeding
Forests
010603 evolutionary biology
01 natural sciences
General Biochemistry
Genetics and Molecular Biology

Life history theory
03 medical and health sciences
Negative selection
Sexual Behavior
Animal

Urbanization
morphology
The Evolution of City Life
Animals
Body Size
Passeriformes
Stabilizing selection
Cities
Selection (genetic algorithm)
Ecosystem
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
General Environmental Science
Parus
Natural selection
General Immunology and Microbiology
biology
Ecology
[SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]
Special Feature
General Medicine
15. Life on land
Mating Preference
Animal

biology.organism_classification
Clutch Size
life-history traits
030104 developmental biology
reproductive selection
Female
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Zdroj: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2018, 285 (1882), pp.20180261. ⟨10.1098/rspb.2018.0261⟩
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2018, 285 (1882), pp.20180261. ⟨10.1098/rspb.2018.0261⟩
ISSN: 1471-2954
0962-8452
Popis: Increasing urbanization offers a unique opportunity to study adaptive responses to rapid environmental change. Numerous studies have demonstrated phenotypic divergence between urban and rural organisms. However, comparing the direction and magnitude of natural selection between these environments has rarely been attempted. Using seven years of monitoring of great tits ( Parus major ) breeding in nest-boxes across the city of Montpellier and in a nearby oak forest, we find phenotypic divergence in four morphological and two life-history traits between urban and forest birds. We then measure reproductive selection on these traits, and compare selection between the habitats. Urban birds had significantly smaller morphological features than their rural counterparts, with a shorter tarsus, lower body mass, and smaller wing and tail lengths relative to their overall body size. While urban female tarsus length was under stabilizing selection, and forest males show positive selection for tarsus length and negative selection for body mass, selection gradients were significantly divergent between habitats only for body mass. Urban great tits also had earlier laying dates and smaller clutches. Surprisingly, we found selection for earlier laying date in the forest but not in the city. Conversely, we detected no linear selection on clutch size in the forest, but positive selection on clutch size in the urban habitat. Overall, these results do not support the hypothesis that contemporary reproductive selection explains differences in morphology and life history between urban- and forest-breeding great tits. We discuss how further experimental approaches will help confirm whether the observed divergence is maladaptive while identifying the environmental drivers behind it.
Databáze: OpenAIRE