A consideration of biomarkers to be used for evaluation of inflammation in human nutritional studies

Autor: Namanjeet Ahluwalia, Stephen T. Holgate, Ascensión Marcos, Judith Moreines, Dirk Haller, R.J.J. van Neerven, Ruud Albers, Nabil Bosco, Bernhard Watzl, Philip C. Calder, Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard, J. Zhao, Michael Müller, C. M'Rini, Graham Pawelec, Marie E. Latulippe, Lena S. Jönsson
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Chemokine
endoplasmic-reticulum stress
coronary-artery-disease
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Inflammation
Celbiologie en Immunologie
necrosis-factor-alpha
Basal (phylogenetics)
blood mononuclear-cells
plasma il-6 levels
Voeding
Metabolisme en Genomica

Voeding
c-reactive protein
Immunity
low-grade inflammation
Humans
Medicine
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
education
Nutrition
VLAG
Global Nutrition
education.field_of_study
ischemic-heart-disease
Wereldvoeding
Nutrition and Dietetics
biology
business.industry
C-reactive protein
Metabolism and Genomics
Diet
Cytokine
Cell Biology and Immunology
Food
Metabolisme en Genomica
Immunology
biology.protein
WIAS
Biomarker (medicine)
Nutrition
Metabolism and Genomics

systemic-lupus-erythematosus
medicine.symptom
business
obstructive pulmonary-disease
Biomarkers
Zdroj: British Journal of Nutrition, 109(S1), S1-S34
British Journal of Nutrition 109 (2013) S1
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname
ResearcherID
ISSN: 0007-1145
Popis: To monitor inflammation in a meaningful way, the markers used must be valid: they must reflect the inflammatory process under study and they must be predictive of future health status. In 2009, the Nutrition and Immunity Task Force of the International Life Sciences Institute, European Branch, organized an expert group to attempt to identify robust and predictive markers, or patterns or clusters of markers, which can be used to assess inflammation in human nutrition studies in the general population. Inflammation is a normal process and there are a number of cells and mediators involved. These markers are involved in, or are produced as a result of, the inflammatory process irrespective of its trigger and its location and are common to all inflammatory situations. Currently, there is no consensus as to which markers of inflammation best represent low-grade inflammation or differentiate between acute and chronic inflammation or between the various phases of inflammatory responses. There are a number of modifying factors that affect the concentration of an inflammatory marker at a given time, including age, diet and body fatness, among others. Measuring the concentration of inflammatory markers in the bloodstream under basal conditions is probably less informative compared with data related to the concentration change in response to a challenge. A number of inflammatory challenges have been described. However, many of these challenges are poorly standardised. Patterns and clusters may be important as robust biomarkers of inflammation. Therefore, it is likely that a combination of multiple inflammatory markers and integrated readouts based upon kinetic analysis following defined challenges will be the most informative biomarker of inflammation. Copyright © ILSI Europe 2013.
Databáze: OpenAIRE