Umeclidinium/vilanterol as step-up therapy from tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD: a randomized, parallel-group, 12-week study

Autor: Edward Kerwin, Dmitry V Galkin, John H. Riley, Chang-Qing Zhu, Chris Kalberg, Alison Church, William A. Fahy
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
Quinuclidines
Time Factors
Vital Capacity
Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive

South Africa
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
tiotropium
Forced Expiratory Volume
Surveys and Questionnaires
Bronchodilator
Clinical endpoint
030212 general & internal medicine
Lung
Original Research
step-up
COPD
Drug Substitution
LAMA
General Medicine
Tiotropium bromide
Middle Aged
Bronchodilator Agents
Intention to Treat Analysis
Europe
Treatment Outcome
Anesthesia
Female
Vilanterol
medicine.drug
medicine.drug_class
Argentina
LABA
Muscarinic Antagonists
Chlorobenzenes
03 medical and health sciences
umeclidinium/vilanterol
medicine
Humans
Least-Squares Analysis
Tiotropium Bromide
Adverse effect
Benzyl Alcohols
Aged
Intention-to-treat analysis
business.industry
technology
industry
and agriculture

Recovery of Function
medicine.disease
United States
Confidence interval
Logistic Models
030228 respiratory system
chemistry
business
Zdroj: International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
ISSN: 1178-2005
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s119032
Popis: Introduction Patients with COPD who remain symptomatic on long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy may benefit from step-up therapy to a long-acting bronchodilator combination. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) in patients with moderate COPD who remained symptomatic on tiotropium (TIO). Methods In this randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study (NCT01899742), patients (N=494) who were prescribed TIO for ≥3 months at screening (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 50%–70% of predicted; modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] score ≥1) and completed a 4-week run-in with TIO were randomized to UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg or TIO 18 µg for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included trough FEV1 at Day 85 (primary end point), 0–3 h serial FEV1, rescue medication use, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs). Results Compared with TIO, UMEC/VI produced greater improvements in trough FEV1 (least squares [LS] mean difference: 88 mL at Day 85 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 45–131]; P
Databáze: OpenAIRE