Understanding contrasting narratives on carbon dioxide capture and storage for Dutch industry using system dynamics
| Autor: | Zahra Janipour, Heleen de Coninck, Floris Swennenhuis, Vincent de Gooyert |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Technology, Innovation & Society, EIRES System Integration |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Context (language use)
02 engineering and technology Energy-intensive industries 010501 environmental sciences Management Monitoring Policy and Law System dynamics 01 natural sciences Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Carbon lock-in Climate change mitigation 020401 chemical engineering Carbon dioxide capture and storage SDG 13 - Climate Action Narrative 0204 chemical engineering 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Netherlands SDG 13 – Klimaatactie Just transition Environmental economics Pollution Crowding out General Energy Framing (social sciences) Software deployment Business Institute for Management Research Environmental Sciences |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 105, pp. 1-16 International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 105:103235. Elsevier International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 105, 1-16 |
| ISSN: | 1750-5836 |
| Popis: | Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) can reduce CO2 emissions, but there is disagreement on its role. The disagreement is reflected in stark differences in stakeholders’ narratives on CCS. In the Netherlands, one extreme narrative focusses on CCS as part of a just transition and another on CCS as contributing to carbon lock-in. These narratives reflect different expectations of dynamic feedbacks around CCS deployment in the specific Dutch industrial context. This paper describes an alternative narrative that can advance the debate on what role CCS may play. Qualitative system dynamics based on interviews with experts is applied to identify the systemic feedback mechanisms that drive the dynamics of CCS in the Dutch industrial system transition, according to the two narratives. We find that CCS may reinforce carbon lock-in through the feedback mechanisms of legitimising, crowding out, and integration, and that CCS may play a part in a just climate transition through employment, economic, and environmental mechanisms. We combine these mechanisms into our alternative framing of CCS that could align the interests of different stakeholders: regulating CCS carefully to maximise its social and climate benefits and minimise the build-up of vested interests and carbon lock-in. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect