What Solar–Terrestrial Link Researchers Should Know about Interplanetary Drivers
Autor: | Yuri Yermolaev, Irina Lodkina, Michael Yermolaev, Alexander Khokhlachev, Lidia Dremukhina |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Physics
Geomagnetic storm Matching (statistics) 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Meteorology solar–terrestrial physics General Physics and Astronomy Elementary particle physics Storm QC793-793.5 01 natural sciences Solar wind Identification (information) interplanetary drivers solar wind 0103 physical sciences Interplanetary magnetic field Interplanetary spaceflight 010303 astronomy & astrophysics 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
Zdroj: | Universe, Vol 7, Iss 138, p 138 (2021) Universe Volume 7 Issue 5 |
ISSN: | 2218-1997 |
Popis: | One of the most promising methods of research in solar–terrestrial physics is the comparison of the responses of the magnetosphere–ionosphere–atmosphere system to various types of interplanetary disturbances (so-called “interplanetary drivers”). Numerous studies have shown that different types of drivers result in different reactions of the system for identical variations in the interplanetary magnetic field. In particular, the sheaths—compression regions before fast interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs)—have higher efficiency in terms of the generation of magnetic storms than ICMEs. The growing popularity of this method of research is accompanied by the growth of incorrect methodological approaches in such studies. These errors can be divided into four main classes: (i) using incorrect data with the identification of driver types published in other studies (ii) using incorrect methods to identify the types of drivers and, as a result, misclassify the causes of magnetospheric-ionospheric disturbances (iii) ignoring a frequent case with a complex, composite, nature of the driver (the presence of a sequence of several simple drivers) and matching the system response with only one of the drivers for example, a magnetic storm is often generated by a sheath in front of ICME, although the authors consider these events to be a so-called “CME-induced” storm, rather than a “sheath-induced” storm (iv) ignoring the compression regions before the fast CME in the case when there is no interplanetary shock (IS) in front of the compression region (“sheath without IS” or the so-called “lost driver”), although this type of driver generates about 10% of moderate and large magnetic storms. Possible ways of solving this problem are discussed. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |