Domains of Discussion in Psychotherapy: What Do Patients Really Want?
Autor: | William E. Greenberg, John R. Peteet, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Mary Anne Badaracco, Michael Miovic, Mary K. McCarthy |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2006 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Psychotherapist Patients Cross-sectional study Ethnic group Human sexuality Politics Race (biology) Surveys and Questionnaires Spirituality Humans Content (Freudian dream analysis) Aged General Medicine Middle Aged Psychotherapy Religion Clinical Psychology Cross-Sectional Studies Content analysis Female Psychology Attitude to Health Clinical psychology |
Zdroj: | American Journal of Psychotherapy. 60:71-86 |
ISSN: | 2575-6559 0002-9564 |
DOI: | 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2006.60.1.71 |
Popis: | Little quantitative data exist on what the content of non-manualized psychotherapy in contemporary clinical settings actually is, and what patients and clinicians think it ought to be. This descriptive pilot study identified potential content areas to address in psychotherapy, quantified the relative importance of these domains of discussion to patients vs. clinicians, and attempted to measure the frequency with which these domains are actually addressed in current clinical practice at two academic, urban hospitals. The conteni areas assessed included health habits, avocations, work, family, friendships, community involvement, spirituality/religion, finance, sexuality, political activities, educational and cultural pursuits, and ethnicity/race. Overall, clinicians and patients agreed about the relative personal importance and importance to treatment of these content areas, and they rated work, family, friends, and sexuality as the most important domains of discussion for psychotherapy. Also, this sample of patients did not feel that clinicians undervalue the importance of religion and spirituality. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |