| Popis: |
IMPORTANCE: Research has shown that early intervention programs can improve academic outcomes of children with developmental delays. It has been suggested that similar programs may combat the deleterious effects of lead on children’s neurodevelopment. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies examining this possibility. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between receipt of early intervention services and third-grade standardized test scores among children exposed to lead before age 3 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study including children born in New York City, New York, from 1994 to 1998 within an administrative data linkage of birth, lead monitoring, early intervention, and education data systems. Participants had a blood lead level of 4 μg/dL or greater at any point before age 3 years and later attended public school in New York City. EXPOSURES: Any use of early intervention services from birth through age 3 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Children who did or did not receive early intervention services were matched using propensity scores. Linear and log-binomial regression were used to estimate the association between receipt of early intervention services before age 3 years and standardized test scores in math and English-language arts in third grade. RESULTS: There were 2986 children exposed to lead who received early intervention services before age 36 months. Of these children, 2757 were propensity score–matched to 8160 children who did not receive services. Children who received early intervention services did 7% (95% CI, 3%-12%) of an SD better on math and 10% (95% CI, 5%-14%) of an SD better on English-language arts tests than children who did not receive services. In addition, children who received services were 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%) and 16% (95% CI, 9%-23%) more likely to meet test-based standards in math and English-language arts, respectively, than children who did not receive services. These associations became larger in magnitude when analyses were restricted to children with higher blood lead levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: By leveraging existing public health data, this study found evidence that receipt of early intervention services may benefit the academic performance of children exposed to lead early in life. |
