Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
| Autor: | Anne-Gita Scheibler, David E. Bauer, Cyrill Dennler, Philipp Fürnstahl, Mazda Farshad, José Miguel Spirig, Tobias Götschi |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | University of Zurich, Bauer, David E |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Operating Rooms
medicine.medical_specialty Hololens Image quality 2745 Rheumatology Headset 610 Medicine & health Voice command device Augmented reality Diseases of the musculoskeletal system 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 2732 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0302 clinical medicine Rheumatology medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Medical physics Point (typography) business.industry Orthopedic Surgical Procedure Navigation Osteotomy Orthopedics Surgery Computer-Assisted RC925-935 Proof of concept Orthopedic surgery Feasibility Studies 10046 Balgrist University Hospital Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Research Article |
| Zdroj: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
| ISSN: | 1471-2474 |
| Popis: | Background Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially available AR head mounted device during orthopedic surgery. Methods Thirteen orthopedic surgeons from a Swiss university clinic performed 25 orthopedic surgical procedures wearing a holographic AR headset (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) providing complementary three-dimensional, patient specific anatomic information. The surgeon’s experience of using the device during surgery was recorded using a standardized 58-item questionnaire grading different aspects on a 100-point scale with anchor statements. Results Surgeons were generally satisfied with image quality (85 ± 17 points) and accuracy of the virtual objects (84 ± 19 point). Wearing the AR device was rated as fairly comfortable (79 ± 13 points). Functionality of voice commands (68 ± 20 points) and gestures (66 ± 20 points) provided less favorable results. The greatest potential in the use of the AR device was found for surgical correction of deformities (87 ± 15 points). Overall, surgeons were satisfied with the application of this novel technology (78 ± 20 points) and future access to it was demanded (75 ± 22 points). Conclusion AR is a rapidly evolving technology with large potential in different surgical settings, offering the opportunity to provide a compact, low cost alternative requiring a minimum of infrastructure compared to conventional navigation systems. While surgeons where generally satisfied with image quality of the here tested head mounted AR device, some technical and ergonomic shortcomings were pointed out. This study serves as a proof of concept for the use of an AR head mounted device in a real-world sterile setting in orthopedic surgery. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |