The use of the so‐called ‘tubs’ for transporting and storing fresh fishery products
Autor: | EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Alessandra De Cesare, Lieve Herman, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist, Maarten Nauta, Luisa Peixe, Giuseppe Ru, Marion Simmons, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Sigurjón Arason, Karen Bekaert, Míriam R García, Marios Georgiadis, Winy Messens, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Sara Bover‐Cid |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Indústries Alimentàries, Funcionalitat i Seguretat Alimentària, Koutsoumanis K., Allende A., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Bolton D., Chemaly M., Davies R., De Cesare A., Herman L., Hilbert F., Lindqvist R., Nauta M., Peixe L., Ru G., Simmons M., Skandamis P., Suffredini E., Arason S., Bekaert K., Garcia M.R., Georgiadis M., Messens W., Mosbach-Schulz O., Bover-Cid S. |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
biological hazards
663/664 040301 veterinary sciences Veterinary (miscellaneous) Fresh fishery product Fish species Transport Storage fish boxes TP1-1185 Plant Science 010501 environmental sciences Bacterial growth 01 natural sciences Microbiology storage 0403 veterinary science Histamine formation Water uptake TX341-641 Fish tub fresh fishery products Fish boxes 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Fish boxe Nutrition. Foods and food supply Biological hazards Chemical technology 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences histamine Fishery Scientific Opinion Fish tubs Biological hazard Fresh fishery products Morganella psychrotolerans transport Fish Environmental science Animal Science and Zoology Parasitology Seawater Histamine Food Science |
Zdroj: | EFSA Journal, Vol 18, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2020) EFSA Journal Koutsoumanis, K, Allende, A, Alvarez-Ordóñez, A, Bolton, D, Chemaly, M, Davies, R, De Cesare, A, Herman, L, Hilbert, F, Lindqvist, R, Nauta, M, Peixe, L, Ru, G, Simmons, M, Skandamis, P, Suffredini, E, Arason, S, Bekaert, K, García, M R, Georgiadis, M, Messens, W, Mosbach-Schulz, O & Bover-Cid, S 2020, ' The use of the so-called ‘tubs’ for transporting and storing fresh fishery products ', EFSA Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, 6091 . https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6091 IRTA Pubpro. Open Digital Archive Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA) Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname |
ISSN: | 1831-4732 |
DOI: | 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6091 |
Popis: | 123 pages, 20 tables, 16 figures, 2 appendix.-- Open access On-land transport/storage of fresh fishery products (FFP) for up to 3 days in ‘tubs’ of three-layered polyethylene filled with freshwater and ice was compared to the currently authorised practice (fish boxes of high-density poly-ethylene filled with ice). The impact on the survival and growth of biological hazards in fish and the histamine production in fish species associated with a high amount of histidine was assessed.In different modelling scenarios, the FFP are stored on-board in freshwater or seawater/ice (in tubs) and once on-land they are ‘handled’ (i.e. sorted or gutted and/or filleted) and transferred to either tubs or boxes. The temperature of the FFP was assumed to be the most influential factor affecting relevant hazards. Under reasonably foreseeable ‘abusive’ scenarios and using a conservative modelling approach, the growth of the relevant hazards (i.e. Listeria monocytogenes, Aeromonas spp. and non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum), is expected to be < 0.2 log10 units higher in tubs than in boxes after 3 days when the initial temperature of the fish is 0°C (‘keeping’ process). Starting at 7°C (‘cooling-keeping’ process), the expected difference in the growth potential is higher (< 1 log10 for A. hydrophila and < 0.5 log10 for the other two hazards) due to the poorer cooling capacity of water and ice (tub) compared with ice (box). The survival of relevant hazards is not or is negligibly impacted. Histamine formation due to growth of Morganella psychrotolerans under the ‘keeping’ or ‘cooling-keeping’ process can be up to 0.4 ppm and 1.5 ppm higher, respectively, in tubs as compared to boxes after 3 days, without reaching the legal limit of 100 ppm. The water uptake associated with the storage of the FFP in tubs (which may be up to 6%) does not make a relevant contribution to the differences in microbial growth potential compared to boxes |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |