Mortality prediction models in the adult critically ill: A scoping review

Autor: Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Morten Hylander Møller, Rick G. Pleijhuis, Ville Pettilä, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Britt E Keuning, Harold Snieder, Renske Wiersema, Thomas Kaufmann, Anders Granholm, José Castela Forte, Frederik Keus
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Keuning, B E, Kaufmann, T, Wiersema, R, Granholm, A, Pettilä, V, Møller, M H, Christiansen, C F, Castela Forte, J, Snieder, H, Keus, F, Pleijhuis, R G, van der Horst, I C C & HEALICS consortium 2020, ' Mortality prediction models in the adult critically ill : A scoping review ', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 424-442 . https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13527
Keuning, B E, Kaufmann, T, Wiersema, R, Granholm, A, Pettilä, V, Møller, M H, Christiansen, C F, Castela Forte, J, Snieder, H, Keus, F, Pleijhuis, R G, van der Horst, I C & HEALICS consortium 2020, ' Mortality prediction models in the adult critically ill : A scoping review ', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 424-442 . https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13527
ISSN: 1399-6576
DOI: 10.1111/aas.13527
Popis: BACKGROUND: Mortality prediction models are applied in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to stratify patients into different risk categories and to facilitate benchmarking. To ensure that the correct prediction models are applied for these purposes, the best performing models must be identified. As a first step, we aimed to establish a systematic review of mortality prediction models in critically ill patients.METHODS: Mortality prediction models were searched in four databases using the following criteria: developed for use in adult ICU patients in high-income countries, with mortality as primary or secondary outcome. Characteristics and performance measures of the models were summarized. Performance was presented in terms of discrimination, calibration and overall performance measures presented in the original publication.RESULTS: In total, 43 mortality prediction models were included in the final analysis. Fifteen models were only internally validated (35%), 13 externally (30%) and 10 (23%) were both internally and externally validated by the original researchers. Discrimination was assessed in 42 models (98%). Commonly used calibration measures were the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (60%) and the calibration plot (28%). Calibration was not assessed in 11 models (26%). Overall performance was assessed in the Brier score (19%) and the Nagelkerke's R2 (4.7%).CONCLUSIONS: Mortality prediction models have varying methodology, and validation and performance of individual models differ. External validation by the original researchers is often lacking and head-to-head comparisons are urgently needed to identify the best performing mortality prediction models for guiding clinical care and research in different settings and populations.
Databáze: OpenAIRE