Outcome measures for technique survival reported in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review

Autor: Thu Nguyen, Simon J. Davies, David W. Johnson, Mark Lambie, Yeoungjee Cho, Karine E. Manera, Josephine Chow, Adrian Liew, Allison Tong, Tess Harris, Matthew Holmes, Neil Boudville, Jeffrey Perl, Arsh K. Jain, Angela Yee-Moon Wang, Daniela Ponce, Emma Elphick, Matthew Tabinor, Annie Claire Nadeau-Fredette
Přispěvatelé: Keele University, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Auckland City Hospital, Polycystic Kidney Disease International, Polycystic Kidney Disease Charity, Queen Mary Hospital, Western University, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), South Western Sydney Local Health District, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales, University of Tasmania, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Centre and Hospital, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, University of Western Australia, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, University of Toronto
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scopus
Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
ISSN: 1718-4304
Popis: Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-25T10:28:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-01-01 Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique survival is an important outcome for patients, caregivers and health professionals, however, the definition and measures used for technique survival vary. We aimed to assess the scope and consistency of definitions and measures used for technique survival in studies of patients receiving PD. Method: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomised controlled studies (RCTs) conducted in patients receiving PD reporting technique survival as an outcome between database inception and December 2019. The definition and measures used were extracted and independently assessed by two reviewers. Results: We included 25 RCTs with a total of 3645 participants (41–371 per trial) and follow up ranging from 6 weeks to 4 years. Terminology used included ‘technique survival’ (10 studies), ‘transfer to haemodialysis (HD)’ (8 studies) and ‘technique failure’ (7 studies) with 17 different definitions. In seven studies, it was unclear whether the definition included transfer to HD, death or transplantation and eight studies reported ‘transfer to HD’ without further definition regarding duration or other events. Of those remaining, five studies included death in their definition of a technique event, whereas death was censored in the other five. The duration of HD necessary to qualify as an event was reported in only four (16%) studies. Of the 14 studies reporting causes of an event, all used a different list of causes. Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity in how PD technique survival is defined and measured, likely contributing to considerable variability in reported rates. Standardised measures for reporting technique survival in PD studies are required to improve comparability. School of Medicine Keele University Department of Nephrology Princess Alexandra Hospital Australasian Kidney Studies Network The University of Queensland Translational Research Institute Department of Renal Medicine Auckland City Hospital Polycystic Kidney Disease International Polycystic Kidney Disease Charity Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital Department of Medicine Western University Botucatu School of Medicine University of Sao Paulo State—UNESP Clinical Innovation and Business Unit South Western Sydney Local Health District Faculty of Nursing University of Sydney UNSW Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales School of Health Science University of Tasmania Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Centre and Hospital The Kidney and Transplant Practice Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital Medical School University of Western Australia Sydney School of Public Health University of Sydney and Centre for Kidney Research The Children’s Hospital at Westmead Division of Nephrology St Michael’s Hospital and the Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St Michael’s Hospital University of Toronto Botucatu School of Medicine University of Sao Paulo State—UNESP
Databáze: OpenAIRE