An experience of mass administration of fractional dose inactivated polio vaccine through intradermal needle-free injectors in Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Autor: | Jaishri Mehraj, Shoukat Ali Chandio, Sohail Ahmed Memon, Rehan Iqbal Baloch, Ahmed Ali Shaikh, Shumaila Rasool, Zamir Ali Phul, Noreen Naz Ansari, Syed Musa Raza, Zahoor Ahmed Baloch, Umar Farooq Bullo |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Injections Intradermal 030231 tropical medicine Disease cluster High coverage Campaign 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Fractional dose Environmental health Epidemiology Medicine Humans Pakistan 030212 general & internal medicine Child Inactivated polio vaccine Needle free business.industry lcsh:Public aspects of medicine Vaccination Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Infant lcsh:RA1-1270 Social mobilization Poliovirus Poliovirus Vaccine Inactivated Vaccination coverage Mass Drug Administration business Research Article Poliomyelitis |
Zdroj: | BMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) BMC Public Health |
ISSN: | 1471-2458 |
Popis: | Background Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) campaign was conducted in February 2019 in Karachi where needle-free injectors were introduced for the administration of the fractional dose of IPV (fIPV) on a large scale. This study aimed to determine the impact of needle-free injectors on vaccination coverage. Methods In four towns of Karachi, fIPV was given using needle-free injectors “PharmaJet Tropis ID”. Whereas, in six towns full dose of IPV was administered to children of 4–59 months of age. Cluster surveys through rapid convenience assessment method were conducted after the completion of vaccination activity. Results A total of 33,815 households’ data was analyzed. Among these, 27,650 (82.8%) children were vaccinated. In fIPV areas, 85.3% of children were vaccinated compared to 79.5% in full dose IPV areas. A comparison of reasons for unvaccinated showed that 1.6% of parents do not give importance to vaccination in fIPV areas compared to 4.2% in full IPV areas (p-value p-value p-value Conclusions Our analysis supports the fractional dose of IPV in mass campaigns to achieve good vaccination coverage especially using needle-free injectors “PharmaJet Tropis ID” and vigorous social mobilization activities are expedient in accomplishing high coverage. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |