Understanding Patients' Preferences: A Systematic Review of Psychological Instruments Used in Patients' Preference and Decision Studies

Autor: Ulrik Kihlbom, Selena Russo, Marie Falahee, Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli, Cathy Anne Pinto, Gwenda Simons, Chiara Jongerius, Gabriella Pravettoni, Jorien Veldwijk, Isabelle Huys, Flavia Faccio, Douwe Postmus, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, Rosanne Janssens
Přispěvatelé: Russo, S, Jongerius, C, Faccio, F, Pizzoli, S, Pinto, C, Veldwijk, J, Janssens, R, Simons, G, Falahee, M, de Bekker-Grob, E, Huys, I, Postmus, D, Kihlbom, U, Pravettoni, G, Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
psychometrics
Health Knowledge
Attitudes
Practice
MAKING STYLE
Economics
Applied psychology
Social Sciences
health status
psychological variables
choice behavior
Pharmaceutical Sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Business & Economics
Health care
030212 general & internal medicine
humans
TRIDIMENSIONAL PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE
attitudes
030503 health policy & services
Health Policy
OF-LIFE
Preference
practice
Locus of control
instruments
Health Policy & Services
0305 other medical science
Psychology
Construct (philosophy)
comprehension
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
mental health
CONNOR-DAVIDSON RESILIENCE
Health literacy
Context (language use)
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
decision making
03 medical and health sciences
Settore M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALE
BREAST-CANCER
Self-efficacy
Science & Technology
business.industry
Public Health
Environmental and Occupational Health
decision making
instruments
measurements
patient preference
psychological variables
stated preferences
health psychology
clinical psychology
medical education
LITERACY
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH LOCUS
SELF-EFFICACY
Farmaceutiska vetenskaper
Mood
Health Care Sciences & Services
health knowledge
surveys and questionnaires
DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM
M-PSI/08 - PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
measurements
business
health literacy
patient preference
stated preferences
Zdroj: Value in Health, 22(4), 491-501. Elsevier Ltd.
Value in Health
ISSN: 1098-3015
Popis: BACKGROUND: Research has been mainly focused on how to elicit patient preferences, with less attention on why patients form certain preferences. OBJECTIVES: To assess which psychological instruments are currently used and which psychological constructs are known to have an impact on patients' preferences and health-related decisions including the formation of preferences and preference heterogeneity. METHODS: A systematic database search was undertaken to identify relevant studies. From the selected studies, the following information was extracted: study objectives, study population, design, psychological dimensions investigated, and instruments used to measure psychological variables. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were identified that described the association between a psychological construct, measured using a validated instrument, and patients' preferences or health-related decisions. We identified 33 psychological instruments and 18 constructs, and categorized the instruments into 5 groups, namely, motivational factors, cognitive factors, individual differences, emotion and mood, and health beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of the psychological factors and related instruments in the context of patients' preferences and decisions in healthcare settings. Our results indicate that measures of health literacy, numeracy, and locus of control have an impact on health-related preferences and decisions. Within the category of constructs that could explain preference and decision heterogeneity, health locus of control is a strong predictor of decisions in several healthcare contexts and is useful to consider when designing a patient preference study. Future research should continue to explore the association of psychological constructs with preference formation and heterogeneity to build on these initial recommendations. ispartof: VALUE IN HEALTH vol:22 issue:4 pages:491-501 ispartof: location:United States status: Published online
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: