An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study of Standardized Patient Comments on Empathy and Student Communication Scores
| Autor: | Laura E. Knockel, Mathew J. Witry, Logan T. Murry, Michelle A. Fravel, Jeffrey C. Reist |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Students
Medical Descriptive statistics Multimethodology media_common.quotation_subject Communication Research Rubric Empathy General Medicine Education Test (assessment) Feedback Categorization Students Pharmacy Education Pharmacy Humans General Pharmacology Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Psychology Association (psychology) Categorical variable media_common Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Am J Pharm Educ |
| ISSN: | 1553-6467 |
| Popis: | Objective. To quantify student pharmacists’ communication ability based on scores from standardized patient (SP) communication rubrics, describe and categorize SP comments about student empathy, and test the relationship between students’ communication scores and empathy. Methods. A concurrent mixed methods research design was used to assess a graded performance-based assessment (PBA) of student pharmacists that had been conducted at one college of pharmacy. The PBA rubrics (n=218) completed by SPs contained 20 assessment items and space for open-ended feedback. Scoring categories for communication assessment included: yes, inconsistent, no, and not applicable (N/A). Descriptive statistics were calculated for rubric scores. Feedback from standardized patients was analyzed and used to categorize student interactions during the encounter as reflecting high empathy, mixed empathy, or low empathy. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to test the relationship between empathy category and communication score. Results. Standardized patients had written comments on 141 of the 218 rubrics (64.7%). The mean communication score was 39.0±1.6 (range, 31-40) out of a maximum 40 points. The total scores for the low, mixed, and high empathy category transformations were 6 (4.3%), 95 (67.4%), and 40 (28.4%), respectively. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA were significant, suggesting that communication scores were different between empathy categories. Conclusion. There was a positive association between students’ scores on communication rubrics and student empathy categorization, with student pharmacists exhibiting different levels of clinical empathy. While the PBA of interest was not specifically focused on empathy, SPs frequently provided feedback about empathy to students, suggesting that showing empathy during the encounter was important. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect