Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?
| Autor: | T. Hopkins, SW Yusuf, J Shaloub, S Ward, D. Cheal, Ankur Thapar |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Observer Variation
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Letters and Comments Ultrasound Vascular Surgery General Medicine medicine.disease Abdominal aortic aneurysm Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening Screening programme Aneurysm Population Surveillance medicine Humans Mass Screening Surgery Clinical significance Radiology business Observer variation Mass screening Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Ultrasonography |
| Zdroj: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 92(6) |
| ISSN: | 1478-7083 |
| Popis: | INTRODUCTION The national abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme measures internal wall diameter; however, UK intervention criteria use external wall diameter. Our aim was to determine the clinical significance of the difference between these two measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients on an aneurysm surveillance programme were ultrasound scanned by two experienced vascular scientists, blinded to the other's results. Maximum anteroposterior internal wall and maximum anteroposterior external wall diameters were measured. RESULTS The median difference between internal and external diameter was 6 mm (IQR 6–7) for scientist 1 and 7 mm (IQR 5–8) for scientist 2. This was statistically significant (P < 0.0002). External wall diameter displayed less interobserver variability m vs 6 mm). CONCLUSIONS Screening measurements underestimate aneurysm size by 6 mm and display greater variability in comparison external wall measurements. These findings should be understood to prevent a delay in the detection and treatment of AAAs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|