A critical appraisal of the clinical applicability and risk of bias of the predictive models for mortality and recurrence in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: Systematic review
| Autor: | Antonio Palazón-Bru, María de Los Ángeles Carbonell-Torregrosa, David López-Bru, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén, David Manuel Folgado-de la Rosa, Emma Mares-García, Enrique Mares-Arambul |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
MEDLINE recurrence mortality 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Bias oropharyngeal neoplasms medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Intensive care medicine death business.industry Cancer Statistical model medicine.disease Checklist Oropharyngeal Neoplasms Critical appraisal Systematic review Otorhinolaryngology Data extraction Research Design 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Model risk Neoplasm Recurrence Local statistical models business Systematic Reviews as Topic |
| Zdroj: | HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO) |
| ISSN: | 1097-0347 1043-3074 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/hed.26025 |
| Popis: | The use of predictive models is becoming widespread. However, these models should be developed appropriately (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modeling Studies [CHARMS] and Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool [PROBAST] statements). Concerning mortality/recurrence in oropharyngeal cancer, we are not aware of any systematic reviews of the predictive models. We carried out a systematic review of the MEDLINE/EMBASE databases of those predictive models. In these models, we analyzed the 11 domains of the CHARMS statement and the risk of bias and applicability, using the PROBAST tool. Six papers were finally included in the systematic review and all of them presented high risk of bias and several limitations in the statistical analysis. The applicability was satisfactory in five out of six studies. None of the models could be considered ready for use in clinical practice. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text