Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients
Autor: | Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís, Edith Lara-Carrillo, Saraí López-González, Sandra Isabel Jiménez-Gayosso, Mauricio Escoffié-Ramírez, Gabriel Eduardo Colomé-Ruiz, Rogelio J. Scougall-Vilchis, César Tadeo Hernández-Martínez |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Adolescent Permanent dentition Overjet Observational Study Orthodontics manual measurement Mandible Overbite Age and sex Perimeter Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Dental Arch 0302 clinical medicine Maxilla digital measurement Humans Odontometry Medicine Body Weights and Measures Arch Mexico business.industry study models Reproducibility of Results Signal Processing Computer-Assisted 030206 dentistry General Medicine medicine.disease Cross-Sectional Studies Calipers Female business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Student's t-test Research Article |
Zdroj: | Medicine |
ISSN: | 0025-7974 |
DOI: | 10.1097/md.0000000000010887 |
Popis: | The objective of this study was to compare the differences between the measurements performed manually to those obtained using a digital model scanner of patients with orthodontic treatment. A cross-sectional study was performed in a sample of 30 study models from patients with permanent dentition who attended a university clinic between January 2010 and December 2015. For the digital measurement, a Maestro 3D Ortho Studio scanner (Italy) was used and Mitutoyo electronic Vernier calipers (Kawasaki, Japan) were used for manual measurement. The outcome variables were the measurements for maxillary intercanine width, mandibular intercanine width, maxillary intermolar width, mandibular intermolar width, overjet, overbite, maxillary arch perimeter, mandibular arch perimeter, and palate height. The independent variables, besides age and sex, were a series of arc characteristics. The Student t test, paired Student t test, and Pearson correlation in SPSS version 19 were used for the analysis. Of the models, 60% were from women. Two of nine measurements for pre-treatment and 6 of 9 measurements for post-treatment showed a difference. The variables that were different between the manual and digital measurements in the pre-treatment were maxillary intermolar width and palate height (P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |