Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation is effectively feasible without previous imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy: insights from the 1STOP project
Autor: | S. De Servi, Maurizio Lunati, M. Landolina, Roberto Verlato, Giuseppe Arena, Antonio Sagone, Giulio Molon, Claudio Tondo, Giuseppe Allocca, Werner Rauhe, Antonio Curnis, Giovanni Rovaris, Paolo Pieragnoli, Gaetano Senatore, Saverio Iacopino |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Cryosurgery Pulmonary vein 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Physiology (medical) Atrial Fibrillation medicine Fluoroscopy Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Prospective Studies Prospective cohort study medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Magnetic resonance imaging Atrial fibrillation Cryoablation Anatomy Middle Aged Ablation medicine.disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging Italy Pulmonary Veins Female Tomography Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Tomography X-Ray Computed |
Zdroj: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 55(3) |
ISSN: | 1572-8595 |
Popis: | Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation (PVI-C) is a standard therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, PVI-C can become a challenging procedure due to the anatomy of the left atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs). Importantly, the utility of imaging before the procedure is still unknown regarding the long-term clinical outcomes following PVI-C. The aim of the analysis is to evaluate the impact of imaging before PVI-C on procedural data and AF recurrence. Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent an index PVI-C. Data were collected prospectively in the framework of 1STOP ClinicalService® project. Patients were divided into two groups according to the utilization of pre-procedural imaging of PV anatomy (via CT or MRI) or the non-usage of pre-procedural imaging. Out of 912 patients, 461 (50.5%) were evaluated with CT or MRI before the PVI-C and denoted as the imaging group. Accordingly, 451 (49.5%) patients had no pre-procedural imaging and were categorized as the no imaging group. Patient baseline characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts, but the ablation centers that comprised the imaging group had fewer PVI-C cases per year than the no imaging group (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |