Mapping health-related quality of life scores from FACT-G, FAACT, and FACIT-F onto preference-based EQ-5D-5L utilities in non-small cell lung cancer cachexia
Autor: | Michela Meregaglia, Ludovica Borsoi, John Cairns, Rosanna Tarricone |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
EQ-5D-5L FAACT FACIT-F FACT-G MAPPING NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER CACHEXIA 2001 HEALTH POLICY Cachexia Lung Neoplasms Cost-Benefit Analysis Economics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) MAPPING 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life I1 Carcinoma Non-Small-Cell Lung Surveys and Questionnaires Health Status Indicators Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Netherlands Aged 80 and over FACIT-F HEALTH POLICY 030503 health policy & services Middle Aged humanities Preference 3. Good health Hydrazines EQ-5D-5L Regression Analysis Female NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER CACHEXIA Non small cell 0305 other medical science Oligopeptides Algorithms Adult medicine.medical_specialty FAACT 03 medical and health sciences FACT-G EQ-5D Humans Lung cancer C2 Aged Health related quality of life Original Paper business.industry Cancer medicine.disease United Kingdom Quality of Life Physical therapy business |
Zdroj: | The European Journal of Health Economics |
ISSN: | 1618-7598 |
Popis: | Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurements from disease-specific tools cannot be directly used in economic evaluations. This study aimed to develop and validate mapping algorithms that predicted EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) utilities from Functional Assessment of Anorexia-Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and their common component (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General—FACT-G) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer cachexia. Methods Data were collected on five occasions over a 12-week period in two multicenter placebo-controlled trials. EQ-5D-5L utilities were calculated using both English and Dutch value sets. The study sample was divided into development and validation datasets according to patients’ geographical residence. Generalized estimating equations were applied to five different sets of independent variables including overall, Trial Outcome Index (TOI), and individual subscales results. The best performing models were selected based on mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean square error (RMSE). Results EQ-5D-5L and FAACT/FACIT-F results were available for 96 patients. The developed algorithms showed a good predictive performance, with acceptable MAE/RMSE and small differences between mean observed and predicted EQ-5D-5L utilities. In FACT-G models, Physical Well-Being had the highest explanatory value, while Emotional Well-Being did not significantly affect the EQ-5D-5L score; Anorexia-Cachexia and Fatigue subscales were highly statistically significant in FAACT and FACIT-F models, respectively, as well as the TOI scores. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status was included as covariate in all models. Conclusion The developed algorithms enable the estimation of EQ-5D-5L utilities from three cancer-specific instruments when preference-based HRQoL data are missing. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10198-017-0930-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |