Ten Years Later: Reflections on Critics' Worst-Case Scenarios for the Affordable Care Act
| Autor: | Linda J. Blumberg, Stacey McMorrow, John Holahan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Employment
National health Economic growth Population Health business.industry Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 030503 health policy & services Health Policy Health Plan Implementation Health Care Costs Population health Health Services Accessibility Insurance Coverage 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Health care Health insurance Health Workforce 030212 general & internal medicine Business 0305 other medical science Health reform Research evidence |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 45:465-483 |
| ISSN: | 1527-1927 0361-6878 |
| Popis: | The primary goals of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage and thereby improve access to needed health care services. Numerous studies have overwhelmingly confirmed that the law has reduced uninsurance and improved affordability of coverage and care for millions of Americans. Not everyone believed that the ACA would lead to positive outcomes, however. Critics raised numerous concerns in the years leading up to the law's passage and full implementation, including about its consequences for national health spending, labor supply, employer health insurance markets, provider capacity, and overall population health. This article considers five frequently heard worst-case scenarios related to the ACA and provides research evidence that these fears did not come to pass. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|