Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting
| Autor: | Bloeme J. Van Der Knoop, R. J. Vermeulen, Jonathan I. M. L. Verbeke, Lourens R. Pistorius, Johanna I.P. de Vries |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Obstetrics and gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), Pediatric surgery, Radiology and nuclear medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Restoration and Development, Human Movement Sciences, AMS - Restoration and Development |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Fetal MRI medicine.medical_specialty Future studies Sedation Brain damage Risk Assessment Ultrasonography Prenatal Fetal brain 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being Pregnancy Sedatives medicine Fetal mri Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives Image quality Prospective Studies Psychiatry Prospective cohort study Netherlands Brain Diseases Fetus 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Obstetrics Brain Obstetrics and Gynecology Prenatal Care Patient Acceptance of Health Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fetal Diseases Acceptance Imaging quality Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Female medicine.symptom CNS business Attitude to Health 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 983-990 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH STARTPAGE=983;ENDPAGE=990;ISSN=0300-5577;TITLE=Journal of Perinatal Medicine Van Der Knoop, B J, Vermeulen, R J, Verbeke, J I M L, Pistorius, L R & De Vries, J I P 2018, ' Fetal MRI, lower acceptance by women in research vs. clinical setting ', Journal of Perinatal Medicine, pp. 983-990 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0360 Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46(9), 983-990. Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| ISSN: | 0300-5577 |
| Popis: | Aim: To determine acceptance of pregnant women to undergo fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in research and clinical setting. Methods: A prospective study included a research group [part of a study comparing brain ultrasound (US) to MRI in fetuses at risk for acquired brain damage] and a clinical group [fetuses with suspected (brain) anomalies after structural US examination] from 2011 to 2014. All women were advised to use sedatives. MRI declinations, use of sedation, MRI duration and imaging quality were compared between both groups. Results: Study participation was accepted in 57/104 (55%) research cases. Fetal MRI was performed in 34/104 (33%) research and 43/44 (98%) clinical cases. Reasons to decline study participation were MRI related in 41%, and participation was too burdensome in 46%. Acceptance was highest for indication infection and lowest in alloimmune thrombocytopenia and monochorionic twin pregnancy. Sedatives were used in 14/34 research and 43/43 clinical cases. Scan duration and quality were comparable (21 and 20 min in research and clinical cases, respectively, moderate/good quality in both groups). Conclusions: Pregnant women consider MRI more burdensome than professionals realize. Two-third of women at risk for fetal brain damage decline MRI examination. Future studies should evaluate which information about fetal MRI is supportive. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|