How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework
| Autor: | Chelsea Ratcliff, Rebekah Wicke |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Public Understanding of Science. 32:410-427 |
| ISSN: | 1361-6609 0963-6625 |
| Popis: | Understanding how to portray uncertain science to the public is a pressing goal for science communication. This study compared US public audience reactions to a news article depicting a novel discovery in neurogenomics as certain or uncertain, with statements of (un)certainty attributed to either affiliated or unaffiliated scientists. The uncertainty disclosure had no main effect on perceived news article credibility, scientist trustworthiness, objectivity of the scientists’ depiction, or willingness to participate in genomic research. However, news credibility and scientist objectivity ratings were higher for uncertainty disclosure attributed to the affiliated scientists. Participants with greater preference for information about uncertainty found the scientists more trustworthy, their depictions more balanced, and the news article more credible when the research was described as uncertain, and these effects were stronger for affiliated scientist attribution. Findings underscore the important roles of disclosure source and audience characteristics in public reactions to media representations of scientific uncertainty. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|