Quantitative light-induced fluorescence images and digital photographs - Reproducibility of manually marked demineralisations
Autor: | Ekaterina Sirazitdinova, Thomas M. Deserno, Rosalia Tatano, Eva E. Ehrlich, Benjamin Berkels, Ulrike Fritz |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Adolescent genetic structures Orthodontic Brackets Dentistry Orthodontics Dental Caries Sensitivity and Specificity Fluorescence Standard deviation 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Humans Lighting Mathematics Ground truth Reproducibility business.industry Significant difference Reproducibility of Results Repeated measures design Tooth surface 030206 dentistry Microscopy Fluorescence Photography Dental Light induced Female Tooth Tissue Oral Surgery business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 78:137-143 |
ISSN: | 1615-6714 1434-5293 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00056-016-0069-6 |
Popis: | Hard tooth tissue demineralisation is an undesirable side effect of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Whereas both clinically and in digital photographs (DP), demineralisations appear as white spot lesions, WSLs appear as dark areas when quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) imaging is used. This study aims at comparing the reproducibility of the detection of decalcified tooth areas in DP and QLF. DP and QLF pairs were acquired from 139 teeth of 32 patients after braces removal. Three raters manually marked the decalcified area on both DP and QLF images. The markings were repeated after 2 weeks. A ground truth was estimated for each tooth and modality using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. The Dice coefficients (DC) of each rater marking to the ground truth were calculated for all teeth and modalities to quantify the spatial agreement. A three-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means of the DCs for both modalities ( $$ p\; < \;0.05 $$ ). Intra-observer and intercycle variabilities were assessed comparing the means across the raters and the cycles for both modalities. ANOVA revealed a statistical significant difference between the modalities [ $$ F (1, 138)\; = \; 62.89 $$ , $$ p \; < \; 0.001 $$ ]. The standard deviation of the DC for the photographs are lower than those for the QLF images. Intra-observer and intercycle differences are rather small as compared to the intermodality differences. The results indicate a higher spatial reproducibility in identifying a decalcified area on a tooth surface using visual inspection of DP rather than QLF images. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |