Can red blood cell function assays assess response to red cell-modifying therapies?
Autor: | Marty Emanuele, Jennell White, S. Chakraborty, Michael Tarasev, Lancelot Moira, Xiufeng Gao, Patrick C. Hines |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Oncology medicine.medical_specialty Erythrocytes Wilcoxon signed-rank test Physiology Cell Erythrocytes Abnormal Phases of clinical research Anemia Sickle Cell Disease 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Hemolysis 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Physiology (medical) Internal medicine Cell Adhesion medicine Humans Red Cell business.industry Hematology Adhesion medicine.disease Red blood cell 030104 developmental biology medicine.anatomical_structure Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Biomarkers |
Zdroj: | Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 80:127-138 |
ISSN: | 1875-8622 1386-0291 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC)-modifying therapies have provided new opportunities for patients with sickle cell disease, although the absence of validated biomarkers of RBC function is a barrier to FDA approval and clinical adoption. Flow Adhesion (FA) and Mechanical Fragility (MF) biomarkers objectively stratify individuals with SCD into pro-adhesive vs pro-hemolytic phenotypes respectively, which may potentially help predict therapeutic responses. OBJECTIVE: A Phase 3 clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of vepoloxamer, an RBC-modifying therapy in sickle cell disease (SCD), failed to meet its primary clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether standardized flow adhesion and mechanical fragility bioassays could differentiate cellular level “responders” from “non-responders” to vepoloxamer treatment. METHODS: Standardized biomarkers of RBC function (adhesion and mechanical fragility) were utilized in this study to assess the effect of veploxamer on blood samples collected from SCD subjects and to determine whether our assays could differentiate cellular-level “responders” from “non-responders” to vepoloxamer treatment. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for differences in adhesion in response to varying vepoloxamer treatments and a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was used to assess differences in mechanical fragility, pre- and post-vepoloxamer treatment. A p-value75%in 54%of patient samples and induced changes in the membranes of sickle erythrocytes (SSRBCs) making sickle cells behave more like normal erythrocytes (AARBCs) in terms of their resistance to hemolysis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the standardized flow adhesion and mechanical fragility biomarkers described here may be useful tools to predict clinical responders to RBC-modifying therapies. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |