Impact of sphincter lesions and delayed sphincter repair on sacral neuromodulation treatment outcomes for faecal incontinence : results from a Finnish national cohort study
Autor: | Camilla Böckelman, Sinikka Salmenkylä, Valtteri Kairaluoma, Jaan Kirss, Tero Rautio, P. Varpe, Matti Kairaluoma, Marja Hyöty, Tarja Pinta, Mikael Victorzon, Saija Hurme |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | University of Helsinki, Clinicum, HUS Abdominal Center |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Male
STIMULATION Anal Canal Cohort Studies Endoanal ultrasound 0302 clinical medicine ULTRASONOGRAPHY Fecal incontinence INTACT ANAL-SPHINCTER Finland digestive oral and skin physiology Gastroenterology Obstetric anal sphincter injury DEFECTS Middle Aged Anal canal 3. Good health PREVALENCE Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure PREDICTIVE FACTORS 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology medicine.symptom Cohort study Sacrum medicine.medical_specialty Manometry Electric Stimulation Therapy PERCUTANEOUS NERVE EVALUATION Lesion 03 medical and health sciences Internal medicine medicine INJURY MANAGEMENT Humans MODULATION Wound Healing Anal sphincter repair business.industry Sacral neuromodulation Faecal incontinence Hepatology 3126 Surgery anesthesiology intensive care radiology Surgery 3121 General medicine internal medicine and other clinical medicine Sphincter business Fecal Incontinence |
Popis: | PurposeThe aim of this multicentre study was to analyse the effects of patent sphincter lesions and previous sphincter repair on the results of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) treatment on patients with faecal incontinence (FI).MethodsPatients examined by endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) with FI as the indication for SNM treatment were included in the study. Data was collected from all the centres providing SNM treatment in Finland and analysed for differences in treatment outcomes.ResultsA total of 237 patients treated for incontinence with SNM had been examined by EAUS. Of these patients, 33 had a history of previous delayed sphincter repair. A patent sphincter lesion was detected by EAUS in 128 patients. The EAUS finding did not influence the SNM test phase outcome (p=0.129) or the final treatment outcome (p=0.233). Patient's history of prior sphincter repair did not have a significant effect on the SNM test (p=0.425) or final treatment outcome (p=0.442).ConclusionsResults of our study indicate that a sphincter lesion or previous sphincter repair has no significant effect on the outcome of SNM treatment. Our data suggests that delayed sphincter repair prior to SNM treatment initiation for FI is not necessary. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |