Safety and efficacy of at-home robotic locomotion therapy in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a prospective, pre-post intervention, proof-of-concept study
Autor: | Markus Knestel, Harry Wolfgang Plewa, Rüdiger Rupp, Hans Jürgen Gerner, Norbert Weidner, Christian Schuld, Daniel Schließmann, Eberhard P. Hofer |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Modified Ashworth scale Science Orthotics medicine.disease Gait Physical medicine and rehabilitation Interquartile range medicine Physical therapy Medicine Paraplegia business Tetraplegia Spinal cord injury Research Article |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 3, p e0119167 (2015) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | BackgroundThe compact Motorized orthosis for home rehabilitation of Gait (MoreGait) was developed for continuation of locomotion training at home. MoreGait generates afferent stimuli of walking with the user in a semi-supine position and provides feedback about deviations from the reference walking pattern.ObjectiveProspective, pre-post intervention, proof-of-concept study to test the feasibility of an unsupervised home-based application of five MoreGait prototypes in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).MethodsTwenty-five (5 tetraplegia, 20 paraplegia) participants with chronic (mean time since injury: 5.8 ± 5.4 (standard deviation, SD) years) sensorimotor iSCI (7 ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) C, 18 AIS D; Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II): Interquartile range 9 to 16) completed the training (45 minutes / day, at least 4 days / week, 8 weeks). Baseline status was documented 4 and 2 weeks before and at training onset. Training effects were assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of therapy.ResultsAfter therapy, 9 of 25 study participants improved with respect to the dependency on walking aids assessed by the WISCI II. For all individuals, the short-distance walking velocity measured by the 10-Meter Walk Test showed significant improvements compared to baseline (100%) for both self-selected (Mean 139.4% ± 35.5% (SD)) and maximum (Mean 143.1% ± 40.6% (SD)) speed conditions as well as the endurance estimated with the six-minute walk test (Mean 166.6% ± 72.1% (SD)). One device-related adverse event (pressure sore on the big toe) occurred in over 800 training sessions.ConclusionsHome-based robotic locomotion training with MoreGait is feasible and safe. The magnitude of functional improvements achieved by MoreGait in individuals with iSCI is well within the range of complex locomotion robots used in hospitals. Thus, unsupervised MoreGait training potentially represents an option to prolong effective training aiming at recovery of locomotor function beyond in-patient rehabilitation.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DKRS) DRKS00005587. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |